Case file · clay · spreadsheet enrichment platform
The Clay alternative for people who'd rather get the answer than build the workflow.
Clay hands you a workbench and 100+ providers. Gumshoe hands you a closed case. One API call, one verdict, evidence attached.
Exhibit · side by side
| CLAY | GUMSHOE | |
|---|---|---|
| WHAT YOU OPERATE | A spreadsheet IDE with waterfalls to build | One API endpoint. Send a brief, get JSON. |
| TIME TO FIRST RESULT | 2 to 4 weeks to real proficiency | One request. The agency writes the prompt. |
| PRICING MODEL | Two meters, credits that burn unpredictably | One credit per company. Fixed. Forecastable. |
| FAILED LOOKUPS | Data credits still spent | Duplicates and undelivered rows never billed |
| PROOF | Source links in cells | Citations + timestamped screenshot exhibits |
| BUILDING A LIST FROM SCRATCH | You wire the sources yourself | One sweep call: discovered, deduped, qualified |
| PRICING | Launch $185/mo, Growth $495/mo. Two separate meters (Actions + Data Credits). Real cost often ~3x the sticker once credits burn. | $99/mo for 2,000 cases. One meter. One case = one company = one credit. You know the cost before you run it. |
THE WEDGE
Clay's most-cited complaint is credit burn you can't forecast: 42% of negative reviews mention it, users report burning $800 in a week just learning, and failed enrichments still get billed. Add a 2-to-4-week learning curve and a $1,000/mo operator, and the sticker price is the small number.
WHEN CLAY IS THE RIGHT CALL
If you live in tables, have a RevOps operator, and want to orchestrate 100+ providers in complex waterfalls, Clay is genuinely powerful. Stay there.
Clay: A powerful spreadsheet IDE for go-to-market: you build waterfall enrichment workflows across 100+ data providers, plus an AI research agent (Claygent). Deep, flexible, and technical.
Put a detective on it
100 free cases a month, no card. Send a question, get a closed case back: verdict, confidence, citations, screenshots.
Open your first caseOther case files